Binding rvalues to ref parameters redux

Atila Neves atila.neves at gmail.com
Fri Apr 5 12:19:34 UTC 2019


On Thursday, 4 April 2019 at 19:29:54 UTC, bitwise wrote:
> On Thursday, 4 April 2019 at 13:43:32 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
>> +1. I *want* `in` to be `scope const`. Any code that breaks as 
>> a result of DIP1000 that uses `in` deserves to break anyway.
>
> Do you have any preference on whether or not 'in' is required 
> for an rvalue to bind to ref?

No. Especially not before seeing the new DIP for that.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list