does D already have too many language features ?

[Atila Neves]

On Monday, 8 April 2019 at 17:20:00 UTC, Manu wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 4:25 AM Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d 
> <digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
>> [...]
>
> That would eject me from the boat.
> That said, I think classes as a discreet feature might be 
> unnecessary.
> classes could be removed if the language were able to express 
> class
> semantics in a struct as a library. That's tricky as hell 
> without ANY
> compiler support though. I can't imagine a way to add concepts 
> like
> `virtual` and `override` as library. It would probably require 
> AST
> macros.


I wonder if virtual and override could be done with UDAs.