dub -> meson

psycha0s box at mail.com
Tue Apr 16 18:10:42 UTC 2019


On Tuesday, 16 April 2019 at 16:42:24 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> What we really need is a dub replacement that has a different, 
> more flexible design that can accomodate things that people 
> want to do, that the current dub simply cannot due to its 
> design limitations.

I absolutely agree. Trying keep backward compatibility is a good 
intention but sometimes you just have to redo everything from 
scratch using accumulated experience. It can be painful but this 
is evolution. Otherwise it can lead to stagnation.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list