dub -> meson
psycha0s
box at mail.com
Tue Apr 16 18:10:42 UTC 2019
On Tuesday, 16 April 2019 at 16:42:24 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> What we really need is a dub replacement that has a different,
> more flexible design that can accomodate things that people
> want to do, that the current dub simply cannot due to its
> design limitations.
I absolutely agree. Trying keep backward compatibility is a good
intention but sometimes you just have to redo everything from
scratch using accumulated experience. It can be painful but this
is evolution. Otherwise it can lead to stagnation.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list