Does D have equivalent of Java util.concurrent?

Dibyendu Majumdar d.majumdar at gmail.com
Sun Apr 28 10:11:51 UTC 2019


On Sunday, 28 April 2019 at 09:24:52 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
> shared does nothing.
> There is strong desire to remove it, most people cast it away 
> since its just a pain in the type system (ignoring its behavior 
> of __gshared for globals).
>
> I think you're over thinking it.
>
> Yes you do need to use some form of memory synchronization 
> strategy.
> No, the language does not force it.
> Yes the standard library does offer some solutions to this end.
> No, the language is by default unsafe and you're free to do 
> anything you want including BSOD your computer. This is what 
> native languages offer you.

Okay that's good )


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list