Building C++ modules
matheus
matheus at gmail.com
Thu Aug 15 00:45:06 UTC 2019
On Friday, 9 August 2019 at 13:17:02 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
> From experience, it makes me work much slower if I don't get
> results in less than 100ms. If I'm not mistaken, IBM did a
> study on this that I read once but never managed to find again
> about how much faster people worked on short feedback cycles.
This is bit an exaggeration right? We're talking about the speed
of a human blink.
I can't see a great difference between 1 sec vs 100 ms "while
working". Of course someone could say if you did 10 consecutive
compilations, then 10 x 100ms = 1 sec while in the other case
would be 10 seconds, but this is extreme, you usually take a time
change code and compile.
But overall I couldn't be bothered at all.
Now imagine waiting ~40 seconds just to open any solution on
Visual Studio (Mostly used for projects where I work), on a NOT
so old machine, and like 4 ~ 10 seconds every time you run an app
while debugging.
That's is the meaning of pain.
Matheus.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list