DIP 1019--Named Arguments Lite--Final Review

[Sebastiaan Koppe]

On Saturday, 24 August 2019 at 16:36:51 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> We have two competing proposals for named arguments. Walter's 
> alternative has been consistently ignored, though I notice 
> Walter mentioned it more than once. That would be totally fine 
> if the proposals were better, but it doesn't take much to 
> figure Walter's is obviously way better, simpler, and 
> integrates beautifully within the existing language.
>
> This entire dynamics strikes me as massively counterproductive. 
> Why are we doing this?

I found Walter's proposal to be such an obvious winner, that I 
expected it to be inevitable. I now see this is not the case.

Let me correct that: I vote for Walter's solution.