DIP 1019--Named Arguments Lite--Final Review

[Kagamin]

On Saturday, 24 August 2019 at 01:09:48 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
wrote:
> Personally, I'm against named arguments in general. They make 
> the parameter names part of the API, which adds another set of 
> names that you have to get right up front and which will be 
> bike-shedded to death.

Errors in function names happen too.

> The _only_ use case IMHO where they add any real value is when 
> you have a long parameter list where most of the parameters 
> having default arguments.

Another use case is replacing the Flag thing. When a function has 
only one parameter and it's has primitive type, names argument 
will have merit.