DIP 1019--Named Arguments Lite--Final Review

[a11e99z]

On Monday, 26 August 2019 at 14:47:01 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
> struct S { int a, b, c, d = 7; }
> S w = { c:1, a:1, 3 };
>
> I don't even know if this result is contrived. Maybe it's 
> trivial?

of course its trivial, this is "D Rorschach test".
even more:
u can get green care-De belt if u can answer how will be 
initialized struct just look at 20 samples.
and u will get brown care-De belt when u can say same for 
overloaded functions.

everything has already been decided.
u can write like that, there won’t be any errors, just don’t 
write like that.