DIP 1019--Named Arguments Lite--Final Review

Olivier FAURE couteaubleu at gmail.com
Wed Aug 28 08:42:35 UTC 2019


On Tuesday, 27 August 2019 at 21:15:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 8/27/2019 8:32 AM, Olivier FAURE wrote:
>> When Walter posted DIP-1021, I gave feedback with detailed 
>> examples in multiple occasions (in PR comments and the review 
>> thread), wrote a draft for a DIP that will propose an 
>> alternate implementation, and posted a type system discussion 
>> when I stalled on a problem. I have yet to see any 
>> acknowledgment of that work from Walter (atila gave some 
>> feedback, though it was fairly surface-level).
>
> I have replied to some of it, but not all. I got called away on 
> a crisis and haven't gotten back to it since, even my proposal 
> on it.
>
> BTW, when you write that you've made proposals and such, it 
> helps a lot to include links to what you're talking about. 
> You're far more likely get interest in it than if people have 
> to go spelunking around wondering what specifically you're 
> referring to.

To be clear, I'm not demanding that you answer what I wrote. You 
don't owe me anything. I'm just saying Andrei's expectations are 
a little unrealistic.

My feedback on DIP 1021: 
https://forum.dlang.org/post/imbicsoobfdugegqjozw@forum.dlang.org
DIP draft for OB semantics: 
https://gist.github.com/PoignardAzur/9896ddb17b9f6d6f3d0fa5e6fe1a7088
Lifetimes discussion: 
https://forum.dlang.org/thread/qssaruktegnbtsdjeyri@forum.dlang.org


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list