Proposal: __traits(getComment, symbol)

FeepingCreature feepingcreature at gmail.com
Wed Aug 28 12:50:35 UTC 2019


On Wednesday, 28 August 2019 at 11:26:34 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
> The alternative approach would be to have a UDA that would be 
> treated as ddoc.

Personally speaking, that doesn't buy me anything.

The primary concern is having good-looking D comments. The 
secondary concern is being able to generate Swagger. Generated 
Ddoc html is a very distant third concern. UDAs that are treated 
as Ddoc would buy me the second at the cost of completely 
destroying the first; I might as well just use regular UDAs, as 
was already proposed.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list