DIP 1026---Deprecate Context-Sensitive String Literals---Community Review Round 1

[Exil]

On Tuesday, 3 December 2019 at 19:42:12 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote
> A DIP ought to be judged by reading the DIP. This DIP is ill 
> informed because it is built around the CFG argument, a 
> non-existing issue. If the DIP requires a forum post explaining 
> how it needs to be judged, that's a problem with the DIP, not 
> the reader.


DIP1021. If that's what someone part of the D federation 
leadership deems is appropriate, I don't see why anyone else 
should be expected to go above and beyond the standard that is 
set.