DIP 1026---Deprecate Context-Sensitive String Literals---Community Review Round 1

[aliak]

On Tuesday, 3 December 2019 at 09:03:44 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> This is the feedback thread for the first round of Community 
> Review for DIP 1026, "Deprecate Context-Sensitive String 
> Literals":
>
> https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/a7199bcec2ca39b74739b165fc7b97afff9e29d1/DIPs/DIP1026.md
>
> All review-related feedback on and discussion of the DIP should 
> occur in this thread. The review period will end at 11:59 PM ET 
> on December 17, or when I make a post declaring it complete.
>
> At the end of Round 1, if further review is deemed necessary, 
> the DIP will be scheduled for another round of Community 
> Review. Otherwise, it will be queued for the Final Review and 
> Formal Assessment.
>
> Anyone intending to post feedback in this thread is expected to 
> be familiar with the reviewer guidelines:
>
> https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/docs/guidelines-reviewers.md
>
> *Please stay on topic!*
>
> Thanks in advance to all who participate.

1) Are there any examples of strings that don't have an in-source 
code workaround if this dip is accepted?

2) the link in rosetta code shows a lot of the languages with 
funky parsing. So I'm not sure that proves anything.

3) how much less complex does the parser actually get? Is it 
trivial?