DIP 1026---Deprecate Context-Sensitive String Literals---Community Review Round 1
something at something.com
Tue Dec 3 23:13:16 UTC 2019
On Tuesday, 3 December 2019 at 09:03:44 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> This is the feedback thread for the first round of Community
> Review for DIP 1026, "Deprecate Context-Sensitive String
> All review-related feedback on and discussion of the DIP should
> occur in this thread. The review period will end at 11:59 PM ET
> on December 17, or when I make a post declaring it complete.
> At the end of Round 1, if further review is deemed necessary,
> the DIP will be scheduled for another round of Community
> Review. Otherwise, it will be queued for the Final Review and
> Formal Assessment.
> Anyone intending to post feedback in this thread is expected to
> be familiar with the reviewer guidelines:
> *Please stay on topic!*
> Thanks in advance to all who participate.
1) Are there any examples of strings that don't have an in-source
code workaround if this dip is accepted?
2) the link in rosetta code shows a lot of the languages with
funky parsing. So I'm not sure that proves anything.
3) how much less complex does the parser actually get? Is it
More information about the Digitalmars-d