opMixin or mixin function templates with convenience operator?
Ola Fosheim Grøstad
ola.fosheim.grostad at gmail.com
Fri Dec 13 14:52:27 UTC 2019
On Friday, 13 December 2019 at 14:39:41 UTC, mipri wrote:
> That's impolite. I think what you've done here is also impolite.
What is impolite is to try to shoot down the relevance of having
AST macros by pointing to Forth and Lisp. What are you trying to
achieve by pointing to ancient languages that use cryptic
identifiers for historic reasons?
AST macros are no worse than templates.
And certainly a lot better than string mixins!
More information about the Digitalmars-d