overcomming inconsistent behaviour of format for array
rikki at cattermole.co.nz
Thu Dec 26 13:15:15 UTC 2019
On 27/12/2019 2:03 AM, berni44 wrote:
> On Thursday, 26 December 2019 at 12:31:25 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
>> Why would this need a DIP?
>> There are no language changes described in your post.
> OK. I just thought, because it will be breaking code and should be
> supported by the community? Also deprecating the current behaviour seems
> not so easy and I think it would be best to have some transition switch
> for the compilers (like with complex). But if that's not enought, to
> have a DIP, it's fine for me too. :-)
With changing formattedWrite, we have to consider printf for what we
support. This isn't about D, its about historical (and current) C code
More information about the Digitalmars-d