templating opEquals/opCmp (e.g. for DSL/expression templates)

[Nicholas Wilson]

On Tuesday, 12 February 2019 at 04:42:39 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
wrote:
> Weren't D's overloaded operators designed specifically with the 
> idea that they _wouldn't_ support stuff like expression 
> templates?

Well you can but only with non-relational operators. IIRC they 
were designed s.t. you only needed to define one function to get 
a suite of operators (c.f. C++).

> They're supposed to emulate the built-in types with how normal 
> equality and the like works, not be used for creating new 
> syntax.

Well the syntax is still the same, just the meaning is different.