DIP 1019--Named Arguments Lite--Community Review Round 1

[Ron J]

On Friday, 15 February 2019 at 19:11:55 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
> ...
> D should not make the fatal mistake of "persevering backwards 
> capability at all cost" scenario, that what c++ is for.
> ...

I agree with this and despite breaking code indeed sucks, for a 
language like D which has a very small user base, I think it 
should go for it instead of adding new properties for handling 
different cases and trying to be like C++.

In fact look for example C++ 17 or 20 and you can clearly see 
that they are trying hard to force people over new features/ways 
of programming and hoping the old "habits" go way.

Ron.