DIP 1019--Named Arguments Lite--Community Review Round 1

[Atila Neves]

On Friday, 15 February 2019 at 17:57:38 UTC, JN wrote:
> On Friday, 15 February 2019 at 17:43:52 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
>>
>> You miss the other reason on why it is not enough: Compile 
>> time and run-time performance penalty.
>> -Alex
>
> Also, when doing a typo, rather than a nice error message "No 
> named argument defined for function foo()", you'd probably get 
> few screens of template vomit :)

Have you tried it? I attempted to static assert on nonsense with 
proper error messages. If you did and got terrible error 
messages, please file a github issue.