State of DIP 1000

Dennis dkorpel at gmail.com
Wed Feb 27 08:54:52 UTC 2019


On Tuesday, 26 February 2019 at 20:30:29 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
wrote:
> It was decided to not make it mean scope with DIP 1000, because 
> doing so would break a lot of existing code - though some folks 
> were very vocal in complaining about that.

That's a pity, I was hoping to abbreviate 'const scope' with 'in' 
in my parameter lists. Was that discussion on this forum?


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list