State of DIP 1000

[Eugene Wissner]

On Wednesday, 27 February 2019 at 08:54:52 UTC, Dennis wrote:
> On Tuesday, 26 February 2019 at 20:30:29 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
> wrote:
>> It was decided to not make it mean scope with DIP 1000, 
>> because doing so would break a lot of existing code - though 
>> some folks were very vocal in complaining about that.
>
> That's a pity, I was hoping to abbreviate 'const scope' with 
> 'in' in my parameter lists. Was that discussion on this forum?

https://forum.dlang.org/thread/akrtdnphwhgjhlwkoood@forum.dlang.org?page=1