The DIP Process

[Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa)]

On 2/26/19 7:06 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:

> Adding a fast-track revise-and-appeal seems a straightforward process 
> revision.  If that were to be given a trial in this case as a goodwill 
> gesture, do you think it might have a chance of de-grumpifying you?  
> (Obviously it's not in my hands to offer that, but raising the idea 
> seems useful.)

Sounds to me like the key is the lack of a "For the love of ****, basic 
common sense shall always prevail over rigid adherence to process!" 
amendment.