DIP 1017--Add Bottom Type--Final Review
Jacob Carlborg
doob at me.com
Tue Jan 15 18:47:58 UTC 2019
On 2019-01-15 11:59, Johan Engelen wrote:
> I know we are no longer supposed to discuss the proposal's merits, but...
>
> The proposal does not describe its merits.
I completley agree.
> 3 - why a new _type_ is needed for describing a property of a function
> (that's what attributes are for)
Not sure it's even worth an attribute. I'm thinking more a pragma.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list