DIP 1017--Add Bottom Type--Final Review

[Dukc]

On Wednesday, 16 January 2019 at 09:19:13 UTC, Nicholas Wilson 
wrote:
> On the contrary, there was lots of objection but no response. 
> As to why it has managed to get this far through the DIP 
> process is beyond me: none of the points in the draft review 
> have been dealt with.

I agree with this. It's okay to reject the proposed alternatives, 
but the DIP should, with some of the proposals at least, state 
why. Otherwise, the DIP should have no business to final review, 
if even to community review.