DIP 1017--Add Bottom Type--Final Review
Walter Bright
newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Wed Jan 16 10:25:21 UTC 2019
On 1/16/2019 2:18 AM, Dukc wrote:
> But also, your DIP needn't make that choice. Since the type is defined with
> `typeof` instead of it's own keyword, anyone can alias the type however he
> wants. The terminology can be left to evolve naturally, without needing to
> dictate a term for the type.
Exactly why it was done that way. It was a way to avoid needing a keyword, much
like `string` is an alias, not a keyword.
The name was never the point of the DIP.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list