Why is vibe.d still performing bad in benchmarks?

[sanjayss]

On Wednesday, 10 July 2019 at 20:47:30 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 9:20 PM bauss via Digitalmars-d < 
> digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
>
>> As seen in: 
>> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r18
>>
>> vibe.d once again ranks terrible on the list.
>>
>> With the power of D etc. it should be able to perform at the 
>> same level as the top frameworks but it just isn't so what are 
>> the reasons, where can it be improved and what areas do we as 
>> community need to look into and improve upon?
>>
>
> Terrible? Really? I would say not perfect but still good. Main 
> problem is with vibe-d:http package. I have try to use vibe-d 
> without it, just use vibe-core and speed was simmilar to others 
> frameworks on top.

It is terrible! Whatever the excuse, there is no other way to 
look at it than to say that based on the tech-empower tests, you 
wouldn't really consider vibe-d for a web-framework.