Could D have fit Microsoft's needs?

Chris wendlec at tcd.ie
Tue Jul 23 11:28:28 UTC 2019


On Tuesday, 23 July 2019 at 00:03:28 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:

> Digital transformation is about adaptiveness and speed.  
> Moore's Law is dead in economic terms and yet useful data sets 
> might grow 10x in the next dozen years.  I don't think there 
> will be a shortage of people in coming years wanting to write 
> fast code fast and some of those will use D.  I've been saying 
> this for a few years now and since then Mercedes, Audi and Weka 
> are just a few of the notable adopters.  I don't think people 
> were expecting that to happen five years ago.  These things 
> take a long time.

Does the community / D Foundation have stats about the following 
things:

1. How many companies (big or small) have stopped using D over 
the years and why?
2. What do Netflix, Mercedes, Audi etc. use D for? In-house / 
niche programs, R&D or big real world applications? E.g. do 
command line tools that copy files count as "XYZ is using D now" 
too?
3. Have they continued to use D or was it just a one-off to see 
if it'd be a good option?

It's easy to drop names of big corporations, but it doesn't tell 
us anything, really.

Also, I suppose a lot of companies / people who just dropped D 
again wouldn't tell you because they a) couldn't be bothered or 
b) out for courtesy.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list