Why Rust for safe systems programming?

[bauss]

On Wednesday, 24 July 2019 at 04:45:48 UTC, Danni Coy wrote:
> code that could activate the GC will fail to compile in code 
> annotated with @nogc
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 1:50 PM zoujiaqing via Digitalmars-d 
> <digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
>>
>> Why Rust for safe systems programming: 
>> https://msrc-blog.microsoft.com/2019/07/22/why-rust-for-safe-systems-programming/
>>
>> Can DLang be disabled for GC, or is it necessary to disable 
>> it? Of course, many people do not like betterC.

Well, it still doesn't disable the GC since the runtime still 
loads it.

Also you can still use the GC in @nogc code if you use 
`assumeNoGC` so it's not entirely gone.