Minimal druntime?

[JN]

On Saturday, 27 July 2019 at 17:57:07 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> I actually think that -betterC is mostly a waste of time, 
> because I don't see enough benefit in using a stripped down 
> version of D over just using C++ to bother, but it definitely 
> can have benefits when porting code, and some people seem to 
> think that it's the way to go, much as I really don't 
> understand that.

I think the main appeal of betterC right now is that it's very 
portable and offers new opportunities. Want to do web with D? 
Only BetterC can compile to WebAssembly at the moment. Want to do 
embedded? Usually only BetterC will be supported. Want to do 
mobile? In many cases it's betterC only.