DIP 1019--Named Arguments Lite--Community Review Round 2

[Yuxuan Shui]

On Thursday, 6 June 2019 at 19:17:38 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
> On Wednesday, 5 June 2019 at 13:03:26 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>> [...]
>
> There's a big issue with this DIP.  It immediately allows any 
> function call to increase coupling with the corresponding 
> function definition with no way to disable it.  I agree that 
> named parameters can increase readability, however, in the 
> majority of cases they actually just add extra noise, i.e.
>
> [...]

See also: 
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n4172.htm

The answer to objection #3 addresses your concern.