DIP 1019--Named Arguments Lite--Community Review Round 2

[Atila Neves]

On Thursday, 6 June 2019 at 20:04:15 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> I'll reiterate what I wrote for DIP1020 
> https://digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/DIP_1020--Named_Parameters--Community_Review_Round_1_325299.html#N325627
>
> ---
>

> <snip>
> One nice thing about this is the { } struct initialization 
> syntax can be
> deprecated, as S(a:1, b:2) can replace it, and would be 
> interchangeable with
> constructor syntax, making for a nice unification. (Like was 
> done for array
> initialization.)

This, plus what Timon added, seems to be a far superior 
alternative. I like it.