DIP 1019--Named Arguments Lite--Community Review Round 2

[Walter Bright]

On 6/9/2019 12:42 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> For my money, named arguments with 
> no reordering means we're wasting our time.

I agree. We'd just have to add it in later. I don't want to have to constantly 
explain why reordering isn't supported. Might as well do it right the first 
time, especially since it is simple and D already does this for field initializers.