Can we just have struct inheritence already?

Tim tim.dlang at t-online.de
Thu Jun 13 21:26:37 UTC 2019


On Thursday, 13 June 2019 at 20:55:34 UTC, Exil wrote:
> This problem happens because you are used @trusted. If you used 
> @safe you wouldn't be able to increment pointers and modify the 
> values the way you did in @trusted.

Here is a completly @safe version:

import std.stdio;

static int[2] data;
static int[253] data2;

void test(bool b) @safe
{
	data[b]++;
}

void main() @safe
{
	bool b = void;
	writeln(data, data2);
	test(b);
	writeln(data, data2);	
}

If b is valid only data can change. But for me data2 changes, 
even though it is never written to.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list