Can we just have struct inheritence already?

[Manu]

On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 7:35 AM Nemanja Boric via Digitalmars-d
<digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 13 June 2019 at 13:32:05 UTC, Joseph Rushton
> Wakeling wrote:
> > On Thursday, 13 June 2019 at 08:24:38 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
> > wrote:
> >> No: the spec disagrees with the implementation, therefore at
> >> least one of them is wrong. It does not immediately follow
> >> that it is the spec that is in error.
> >
> > It's reasonable to say in this case that the spec is in error,
> > because Walter has always been 100% clear that @safe refers
> > only to memory safety, and the implementation reflects that
> > intent.
>
> Not really:
>
> https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19326
>
> > tupleof is known to break through private access protections.
> > It should probably not be allowed in @safe code.

Wait... what?
"tupleof is known to break through private access protections. It
should probably not be allowed in @safe code." - Walter Bright

Breaking private access is not in any way shape or form a memory
safety violation.