The DIP Process

Mike Parker aldacron at gmail.com
Fri Mar 1 06:13:39 UTC 2019


On Thursday, 28 February 2019 at 23:17:15 UTC, Olivier FAURE 
wrote:
>.
>
> If that's the direction you're going for, then the rejection 
> rationale needs to be a little more polished than DIP-1016's 
> was.
>

That's mostly on me. I take the informal feedback they give and 
craft the summary. I've committed to providing more detailed 
review summaries in the future and they've committed to helping 
me do so.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list