The DIP Process

Walter Bright newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Sat Mar 2 03:51:00 UTC 2019


On 3/1/2019 2:01 PM, Jonathan Marler wrote:
> Exactly.  With the current process everyone is doing alot of work and producing 
> no results.  We are proposing to change the process not to save work, but to 
> turn the work we are already doing into effective results.

Dip1016 is not "no result". It's clear that rvalues to ref parameters is the way 
forward. I'm now writing the DIP for it.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list