The DIP Process
Walter Bright
newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Sat Mar 2 03:51:00 UTC 2019
On 3/1/2019 2:01 PM, Jonathan Marler wrote:
> Exactly. With the current process everyone is doing alot of work and producing
> no results. We are proposing to change the process not to save work, but to
> turn the work we are already doing into effective results.
Dip1016 is not "no result". It's clear that rvalues to ref parameters is the way
forward. I'm now writing the DIP for it.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list