DIP 1019--Named Arguments Lite--Community Review Round 1
Olivier FAURE
couteaubleu at gmail.com
Sun Mar 3 12:46:22 UTC 2019
On Sunday, 3 March 2019 at 10:50:05 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
> If API opt-in to named parameter support is not adequate, then
> it's better to drop the feature request entirely, because it is
> not reasonable to impose a big new responsibility like named
> arguments on maintainers of existing codebases.
I think you're overstating how big the responsibility is.
Maintainers can still change argument names with the current DIP,
they just need to keep exporting a prototype with the old names.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list