DIP 1019--Named Arguments Lite--Community Review Round 1

[Yuxuan Shui]

On Friday, 1 March 2019 at 13:37:24 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling 
wrote:
> On Thursday, 28 February 2019 at 21:55:50 UTC, Olivier FAURE 
> wrote:
>> [...]
>
> Is the idea here that you can effectively define "aliases" for 
> the parameter names (e.g. to help transitions), but not have 
> multiple function implementations with the same type signatures 
> and different names?
>
> That presumably impacts back on the mangling question, and 
> whether the parameter names need to be included in the function 
> mangling ... ?

Function names won't be included in mangling. It is a bit 
complicated now since this version of this DIP includes 
reordering, but the next revision won't.