Postfix type notation - readability and parsing?

[Dennis]

On Thursday, 7 March 2019 at 20:18:28 UTC, aliak wrote:
> Hmm, thanks for pointing that out! I guess that's indeed 
> ambiguous without parens or something.

I'm not in favor of adding a second type syntax, but note that 
the current scheme is also ambiguous:

const int[]

Is that const(int[]) or const(int)[]? It's the former, if you 
want the latter use explicit parentheses. Operators in general 
are full of ambiguities that are solved by precedence and 
associativity rules and parens to override them.