memory management and the standard library

[Kagamin]

On Thursday, 14 March 2019 at 21:32:21 UTC, JN wrote:
> In D, the answer is "oh, you can totally do that, just this 
> won't work, and this is needed, and this will probably not 
> compile, oh and no one tested that". It adds a lot of cognitive 
> overhead, and unfortunately there are many points of division 
> like that.

@nogc is inherently cognitive overhead.