Why can't I give a function's return type the scope storage class?

[Walter Bright]

On 3/18/2019 7:22 PM, Meta wrote:
> I think what you meant was this:
> 
> T* doSomething(return scope T*);
> 
> scope val = doSomething(someOtherVal);
> 
> Right?

Yes, except it is unnecessary to mark val as scope. The compiler will attach 
scope to it automatically if someOtherVal is scope.