Why can't I give a function's return type the scope storage class?

[Walter Bright]

On 3/18/2019 7:28 PM, jmh530 wrote:
> BTW, did you see this:
> https://atilaoncode.blog/2019/03/13/issues-dip1000-cant-yet-catch/

C++ has no protection for its library types, except by convention. Translating 
them by rote into D leaves those problems intact. They need to be redesigned 
with D's mechanisms in mind for them to be memory safe. Leaking pointers to its 
internals is exactly that sort of issue.