shared - no read/write access

[Manu]

On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 2:25 PM Kagamin via Digitalmars-d
<digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 19 March 2019 at 20:08:37 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > Last time we talked about shared, I think we all agreed on one
> > thing; shared should hot have read/write access to data members.
> >
> > Does anyone know how to implement this? I would really like to
> > try some important experiments with shared if it worked.
>
> shared qualifier provides a guarantee that thread local data is
> thread local, it doesn't provide safety for concurrency, not
> supposed to, because it's not realistically feasible at such low
> level, and attempts to do it like yours only add noise,
> complicate reasoning and make errors only more likely. Normally
> it's unshared data that should have a qualifier, because that's
> actually a feature being provided, but because it would be a
> nuisance, the opposite was done.

I have literally no idea what you're talking about.