Thoughts about std.experimental.all?

Seb seb at wilzba.ch
Thu Mar 21 12:12:00 UTC 2019


On Monday, 4 March 2019 at 05:43:21 UTC, Seb wrote:
> On Friday, 1 March 2019 at 18:35:26 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
>> On Friday, 1 March 2019 at 18:18:29 UTC, Seb wrote:
>>> On Friday, 1 March 2019 at 18:15:01 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
>>>> So if this is a poll for promotion of std.experimental.all 
>>>> to std.all, you have my +1.
>>>
>>> It would just be `import std` ;-)
>>> That was my goal all along when I pushed for and created 
>>> std.experimental.all.
>>
>> +2 ten ;-)
>
> FYI: Now you can show your support in this PR -> 
> https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/6889

OK. Thanks a lot for your support!
This is now in master and coming to your nearest DMD nightly and 
DMD 2.086:


https://dlang.org/changelog/pending.html#std-all


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list