shared - no read/write access

Kagamin spam at here.lot
Mon Mar 25 08:36:42 UTC 2019


On Thursday, 21 March 2019 at 19:50:31 UTC, Rubn wrote:
> If the data is thread local, then it is already guaranteed to 
> have no conflict with other threads. Hence it being "thread 
> local", only the local thread can access the data. There's no 
> need for a "shared" qualifier in this regard.

In case of D the claim doesn't hang in a vacuum, but is supported 
by the type system.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list