Thoughts about unittest run order

H. S. Teoh hsteoh at quickfur.ath.cx
Tue May 7 21:57:42 UTC 2019


On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 05:30:03PM -0400, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 5/7/19 1:22 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > 
> > But perhaps what I'm really looking for is a way to invoke a
> > *specific* unittest
> 
> unit-threaded. Seriously, it's awesome. Use it. You'll be happy :)

OK, point taken. I'll go check it out. :-P


> But as far as the default test runner and order of code layout, those
> are some really interesting points. With a low-level-to-high-level
> ordering, then in many cases you wouldn't even need to point at a
> particular test you want to focus on.

Well yes, and being the lazy coder that I am, this least-effort path is
particularly appealing to me.


T

-- 
WINDOWS = Will Install Needless Data On Whole System -- CompuMan


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list