Language performance benchmark be updated 2019/11/09
Daniel Kozak
kozzi11 at gmail.com
Sun Nov 17 10:36:41 UTC 2019
On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 5:50 PM Jacob Shtokolov via Digitalmars-d
<digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
>
> On Saturday, 16 November 2019 at 16:34:58 UTC, Jacob Shtokolov
> wrote:
> > Just tried to compile and run Base64
>
> The Havlak test is closer to reality:
>
> ```
> Nim: 12.24s, 477.8Mb
> C++: 17.33s, 179.3Mb
> Golang: 21.58s, 358.0Mb
> D LDC2: 23.55s, 460.4Mb
> D DMD: 29.04s, 461.9Mb
> ```
>
> Nim is the winner.
>
> But here I would look into the code: what makes LDC produce such
> poorly optimized binary.
>
LDC binary is ok, this is about GC, I was able to make it lamost as
twice fast for ldc with some improvments
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list