[SAoC] 'DPP with Linux kernel headers' Project Thread

Cristian Becerescu cristian.becerescu at yahoo.com
Mon Nov 18 10:37:48 UTC 2019

Update for week 5 of Milestone 2

I've implemented and submitted solutions for the following bugs:

> ---Bug #1---
> Accessors for members of anonymous records are not renamed when 
> the members are keywords

PR: https://github.com/atilaneves/dpp/pull/213
Status: Merged.

> ---Bug #2---
> The fixFields() method doesn't work when multiple structs have 
> a field (of type pointer to struct) which needs renaming

PR: https://github.com/atilaneves/dpp/pull/214
Status: Merged.

> ---Bug #3---
> Some code is translated to enum BLA = 6LLU;
> LLU is not valid in D (LL needs to be changed to L).

PR: https://github.com/atilaneves/dpp/pull/215
Status: Need to add unit test.

> ---Bug #4---
> An enum is initialized with a value of 68719476704, which 
> produces this:
> Error: cannot implicitly convert expression 68719476704L of 
> type long to int

PR: https://github.com/atilaneves/dpp/pull/217
Status: AppVeyor build fails (on Windows 32-bit), will look into 

> ---Bug #5---
> Again regarding C11 anon records: in its output, dpp writes 
> "const(_Anonymous_55) version_;", and this conflicts with the 
> accessor functions' name for a struct field. I will try to 
> figure out the reason why dpp adds that declaration in the 
> first place and fix this (most probably another renaming issue).

PR: https://github.com/atilaneves/dpp/pull/216
Status: Just need to add a comment and after that probably done.

As for the rest of the issues, I'm still debugging and trying to 
figure out how to reproduce some of them on smaller examples.

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list