lifetime issue: Bug or not?
jared771 at gmail.com
Sun Nov 24 09:05:14 UTC 2019
On Saturday, 23 November 2019 at 04:20:33 UTC, Steven
> On 11/22/19 10:46 PM, Meta wrote:
>> Are you passing the -dip1000 switch to the compiler? I
>> reproduced this with a toy version of your code, but the
>> compile error goes away when I pass the -dip1000 switch to the
> I am not. But I admit that I didn't have the return attribute
> at first. I added it to see if it helped (it didn't).
> Can you post the toy version? Might be reasonable for a bug
> report. I couldn't figure out a minimal case.
It's just your code (@safe added for good measure):
SQLStatement foo(int id)
auto stmt = SQLStatement("`foo`"); // table
return stmt.where("`id` = ?", id);
ref SQLStatement where(T)(return ref SQLStatement stmt, string
clause, T val)
This code fails to compile unless dip1000 is turned on.
More information about the Digitalmars-d