DIP 1024--Shared Atomics--Community Review Round 1

12345swordy alexanderheistermann at gmail.com
Tue Oct 1 20:47:22 UTC 2019


On Tuesday, 1 October 2019 at 20:35:51 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 10/1/2019 9:08 AM, 12345swordy wrote:
>> There is no detail on how is this going to be implemented.
>
> It'll disallow direct translation of operators to code, instead 
> the user will have to call core.atomic library functions to do 
> it, and the compiler may treat those as intrinsics.

Does this mean that the user can rollout their own custom 
implementation?

-Alex


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list