DIP 1024--Shared Atomics--Community Review Round 1
anonymous at example.com
Tue Oct 1 22:07:27 UTC 2019
On 01.10.19 22:34, Walter Bright wrote:
> Actually, shared operations would no longer be generated from the
> syntax. They'd all be done with library functions
To clarify, we're going to get this(?):
shared int x;
x = 42; /* error */
You should change the first sentence of the DIP then. It says: "Reads
and writes to data typed as shared are made atomic where the target CPU
supports atomic operations".
From that sentence I would very much expect the code be accepted and
generate an atomic write.
More information about the Digitalmars-d