DIP 1024--Shared Atomics--Community Review Round 1

Walter Bright newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Fri Oct 4 03:44:26 UTC 2019

On 10/1/2019 1:47 PM, 12345swordy wrote:
> On Tuesday, 1 October 2019 at 20:35:51 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> On 10/1/2019 9:08 AM, 12345swordy wrote:
>>> There is no detail on how is this going to be implemented.
>> It'll disallow direct translation of operators to code, instead the user will 
>> have to call core.atomic library functions to do it, and the compiler may 
>> treat those as intrinsics.
> Does this mean that the user can rollout their own custom implementation?

Yes, as they can today.

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list